[rfu-automation] Re: [rfu-tech] Email contact info

[Noel L. Vivar]

Sorry. I hope that I didn't sound snide with my phone booth comment. I 
was just trying to be funny. I know that if I'm listening to bitrates 
that low, they sound pretty bad. I didn't know what we were pushing out 
on our transmitter.

Peace. -Noel


dan blah wrote:
> On 4/9/07, Noel L. Vivar <nlvivar at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> FYI, a 2 min. PSA is actually fairly standard. I think that the last
>> radio station I worked at got professionally done PSAs from the WWF
>> (wildlife, not wrestling) and the Dairy Association (they talked about
>> how you should check your cows to stop some udder disease) frequently
>> received CDs and they would often have ~30 sec, ~1 min, and ~2 min,
>> recordings, so you can choose in the booth.
>>
> i guess i dont really care how long they are but i do know that we
> cant have many large files in the mailing list.
> 
>> Anyways, 2 minutes is not unreasonable. However, we could make any hard
>> and fast rule that we want.
>>
> yeah again, i dont care how large they are.  if we are going to have
> larger files we need to make this part of the website rather than
> stored in emails/mailing lists.
> 
>> Also, we currently do not have any bitrate limit posted. Should I say
>> that everything should be at 96kbps mp3 and have everything sound like
>> it was recorded in a phone booth?
>>
> FYI, 96kbps is way better than both phone (~21kbps) and fm radio (~56kbps).
> 
>> Peace. -Noel
>>
>> dan blah wrote:
>> > there should never be a reason to have anything that big.  psa's
>> > should be less than 30s and no more than a 96kbps mp3.
>> >
>> > On 4/9/07, dan blah <dan.blah at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 4/9/07, Noel L. Vivar <nlvivar at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> >> > Any file size limitations?
>> >> >
>> >> 4096KB (4MB)
>> >>
>> >> > It was an mp3 file...
>> >> >
>> >> > However, I was able to send it through, so I'm still not sure 
>> what the
>> >> > problem is.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Noel
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > dan blah wrote:
>> >> > > it is set to just pass everything as this list is not yet a haven
>> >> for spam.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 4/9/07, Mike Lehman <rebelmike at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> > >> Does it bounce completely or does Ray just get a message
>> >> indicating it's
>> >> > >> being held for moderation? I think if it's not the moderation
>> >> message,
>> >> > >> that can be turned on. And I think it may be possible to 
>> reword the
>> >> > >> moderation message so that PSA submitters are assured that their
>> >> message
>> >> > >> will go through.
>> >> > >> Mike Lehman
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Noel L. Vivar wrote:
>> >> > >> > So Ray just tried to email a PSA to rfu-automation, which is 
>> the
>> >> > >> > contact address listed on the website as of right now. However,
>> >> he has
>> >> > >> > confirmed  my suspicion that if you're not a subscriber, you 
>> can't
>> >> > >> > mail there...
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Do we want to make a separate email address to handle all 
>> incoming
>> >> > >> > communication from outside the station?
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > -Noel
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> _______________________________________________
>> >> > >> rfu-automation mailing list
>> >> > >> rfu-automation at lists.chambana.net
>> >> > >> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/rfu-automation
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Noel L. Vivar
>> >> > 505 E. Clark St., Apt. 24
>> >> > Champaign, IL 61820-4420
>> >> > c.630.740.5775
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Noel L. Vivar
>> 505 E. Clark St., Apt. 24
>> Champaign, IL 61820-4420
>> c.630.740.5775
>> _______________________________________________
>> rfu-automation mailing list
>> rfu-automation at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/rfu-automation
>>
> 
> 



-- 
Noel L. Vivar
505 E. Clark St., Apt. 24
Champaign, IL 61820-4420
c.630.740.5775