[rfu-membership] Re: [Rfu-station] Upcoming Code Change

[Andrew Ó Baoill]

Tom - this seems a bona fide excuse for not doing re-training right  
now, though Lavana has a point about the intent of requiring groups.  
On the other hand, as Lavana also notes, we have various groups which  
are using 'silent partners' - something I'd like to move away from  
over time (though in this case Genevieve has been active and is absent  
temporarily).

Let's look to find a solution that accommodates your group - perhaps  
noting that Genevieve will undertake training as soon as she's back in  
town, later this semester or in the Spring? I leave it to the  
membership group/list to agree on a policy....

Andrew

On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:21 AM, RANDALL R HAWKINS wrote:

> I am copying Andrew and the membeship list with your question, Tom.
> My understanding of the purpose of the two people in a programming  
> group policy is that it fosters a sence of community, and that it  
> makes it easier for shows to remain on the air consistently.   If a  
> member is not really here, that doesn't happen.  That said, I also  
> know that it is very common for the second person in a programming  
> group to simply be a silent partner.  And really how a programming  
> group works is up to the programming group.  So having a partner not  
> be here has been an accepted policy.
> Can you give us a date that we can check back with you, and be sure  
> that your partner has been trained by?  Does that seem reasonable to  
> everyone else?
>
> Of course, the membership due will need to be paid for them, whether  
> they are here or not.  Perhaps that is one of the forms I will be  
> picking up today?
>
> Lavana
>
> --- On Tue, 10/7/08, Tom Garza <tgarza at precisiongraphics.com> wrote:
> From: Tom Garza <tgarza at precisiongraphics.com>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Rfu-station] Upcoming Code Change
> To: lrhawkins at sbcglobal.net
> Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 9:03 AM
>
> Hello,
>
> my show partner is teaching this semester at a tribal community  
> college in Minnesota, and has no reasonable way of getting back here  
> to do the retraining. Given that she also doesn't come back here and  
> use the studio or broadcast either (joining me by phone for shows  
> whenever possible), is the retraining strictly necessary at this  
> time and in this instance?
>
>  thanks
>
> tom g  11th Indian
>
>
>> Retraining and membership renewal must be completed before the  
>> meeting Tues Oct 7 at 8 pm.  I will be collecting the final batch  
>> of forms from the office tomorrow and sending a list of all shows  
>> that have completed their training and membership renewals -- and  
>> those that haven't -- to the meeting tomorrow night. The plan is  
>> that the code on the studio will  be changed and the new code will  
>> only be sent to those that have completed retraining and renewed  
>> their memberships.  If everyone in your programming group has not  
>> completed these necessary tasks, an e-mail now with your intentions  
>> would be helpful.
>>
>> Lavana
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rfu-station mailing list
>> Rfu-station at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/rfu-station

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/rfu-membership/attachments/20081007/ea0b7c81/attachment.htm