[Imc-tech] Re: [Imc-space] field bag #5

[Paul Riismandel]

Yes, we should talk to Sehvilla and Michael, and if indeed it is true that 
Sehvilla borrowed the bag improperly then she should face the $2 fine.

I suggest we add to our policy  a $1 fine for every piece of equipment not 
returned with the bag.   Since we have no such fine at the moment it would 
be unfair to make this retroactive for Sehvilla.  And, of course, the 
borrower must be responsible for any equipment s/he loses.

--Paul

At 06:26 PM 2/24/2002 -0600, Mike Lehman wrote:
>I suggest talking with Sehvilla (and Michael) about the circumstances so
>that we are clear exactly what transpired.
>
>I think we do need to go ahead with some sort of more bureaucratic
>approach to this in general, because it causes too much trouble for this
>to be repeated so often. Making the Equipment Closet a "No Lone Zone"
>i.e. TWO people have to be involved in checking equipment out, will go a
>long way to remedy the situation. I realize this may be inconvenient for
>some, but we can't simply let this continue without a better way of
>assigning responsibility for equipment use (and misuse.) Locking it up
>may be our only solution.
>Mike Lehman
>
>Brian Hagy wrote:
> >
> > field bag #5 returned today, incomplete.  the mic, mic cable, and
> > headphones were not in the bag.  minidisc #5 was also found later just
> > sitting on the workspace between sergei and mojo.
> >
> > the mic, mic cable, and headphones have also been returned, along with the
> > following message:  "Sehvilla, You left these at the Oxfam Banquet.  If
> > you could reunite them w/ their brethren in gig bag #5, that'd be great.
> > :)    Michael".   the mic, mic cable, and headphones were sitting on the
> > check-out sheet for #5 (so, thank you michael for returning them, if
> > you're reading this).
> >
> > my question to the space/tech groups is how to handle this situation.
> > the bag was not checked out, and was returned incomplete.  had someone
> > else from the imc not been at the event, then we would be out the
> > equipment.  our policy does say that sehvilla will owe us money for not
> > checking out the bag.  however, the policy does not cover what we do when
> > equipment is not returned complete. (though technically all the equipment
> > did make its way back, i still think its appropriate to consider that the
> > equipment was not returned in the condition it left).
> >
> > thoughts, suggestions?
>_______________________________________________
>Imc-space mailing list
>Imc-space at urbana.indymedia.org
>http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-space