[Peace-discuss] secret evidence and secret proceedings
pfmueth at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
pfmueth at ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Fri Jun 14 18:03:14 CDT 2002
At the Friends of Ahmed Press conf/rally this morning, the recent
ruling by bushcroft allowing secret INS proceedings was conflated
with the provisions almost six years old that allow for secret
evidence .
looking for some clarity . . here's one of several short pages
from the American Muslim Council with background. .
I searched the aclu looking for some info on what I think is the
first major use of this provision, the LA seven, but I haven't found
details yet.
What is very interesting here is that the gov't apparently hasn't
used the court preferring to "merely" use it for detainment. . ..
http://www.amconline.org/sevidence/
What is Secret Evidence
The 1996 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act established a
new court charged only with hearing cases in which the government
seeks to deport aliens accused of engaging in terrorist activity
based on secret evidence submitted in the form of classified
information. The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act expanded the secret evidence court so that secret
evidence could be more easily used to deport even lawful permanent
residents as terrorists. It also included provisions allowing the
government to use secret evidence to deny bond to all detained
non-citizens and to deny various discretionary immigration benefits
such as asylum to all non-citizens, including those not accused of
being terrorists.
Though the secret evidence court has not yet heard a case, the INS
has moved in dozens of other proceedings to use secret evidence
against non-citizens to deny them bond and relief from deportation,
such as asylum. In fact, the INS attempts to use secret evidence to
deny mandatory relief from deportation, such withholding of
deportation, even though it has no statutory authority to do so.
Virtually every recent secret evidence case that has come to public
attention involves a Muslim or an Arab. The ACLU represents one such
non-citizen, Nasser Ahmed, a 37-year old Egyptian who was denied
bond, asylum and withholding based on secret evidence. The
immigration judge who heard the evidence said that he had "no doubt"
that Mr. Ahmed would be tortured if returned to Egypt. If the
decision in his case had been based only on the evidence in the
public record -- evidence that Mr. Ahmed had the chance to challenge
-- Mr. Ahmed would be a free man today. Instead, he was held in
solitary confinement for over three years, and is still being
detained, without being told why and thereby given a change to refute
the accusations against him.
Secret evidence is also being used to detain in Florida without bond
Mazen Al-Najjar, a stateless Palestinian. One day at breakfast with
his wife as he helped his daughters get ready for school, he answered
a knock on the door. This 18-year resident of the United States was
immediately detained for alleged violations of the immigration laws.
When he asked for release on bond -- which is commonly granted
similarly-situated non-citizens who are likely to appear for their
immigration hearings because of their strong family and community
ties -- his request was denied, based on secret evidence. Two years
has elapsed and Mr. Al-Najjar still does not know the basis for his
detention.
The INS is also using secret evidence in cases involving seven Iraqis
airlifted by the U.S. from Northern Iraq because they were part of a
failed CIA plot to destabilize the regime in Iraq headed by Saddam
Hussein. The INS is denying them political asylum based on secret
evidence. A legal team including former Director of Central
Intelligence R. James Woolsey represents them. Mr. Woolsey, who was
himself denied the opportunity to see the evidence against his
clients, commented that secret evidence is what "one would expect to
find in Iraq, not the U.S." Five of the seven recently agreed to be
deported in exchange for release from custody with certain
limitations on their liberty while they search for a foreign country
that will accept them.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20020614/92ff49d3/attachment.htm
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list