[Peace-discuss] Fwd:[ANSWER]: Iraqis can't turn off the TV to make (1 of 2
jencart
jencart at mycidco.com
Wed Apr 2 07:25:11 CST 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole world is watching us die"
APRIL 12:
The World Stands Together Against War
In the face of Iraqi resistance to the invasion, the U.S.
military strategy has abruptly shifted in the last few
days. Instead of posing as liberators, the U.S. high
command has called for open warfare against the Iraqi
civilian population. In the last 48 hours, hundreds of
civilians have been shot down on the roadways, in their
homes, on their farms. The aerial bombings are becoming more indiscriminate as missiles land in markets and
residential neighborhoods.
The Iraq war has suddenly taken on the worst features of the U.S. war in Vietnam. Facing a defiant and resisting
population, U.S. troops, under the direction of their
officers, treat all members of the population as suspect and decide to shoot first and ask questions later. The
U.S. soldiers have been lied to about their mission. They
have been sent to kill and be killed in a war for empire
and conquest, not liberation. U.S. casualties are mounting in this war that need not have happened.
On March 31, there was a massacre of civilians, mainly
women and their children, whose crime was that they were driving on a roadway in their own country. As their van approached a checkpoint, U.S. soldiers destroyed their
vehicle with a barrage of 25mm cannon fire from one or more of their M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles. The Washington Post quoted Capt. Ronny Johnson of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division in his series of orders to the troops present:
- "Fire a warning shot"
- "Stop [messing] around!"
- "Stop him, Red 1, stop him!"
- "Cease fire!"
- "You just [expletive] killed a family because you didn't fire a warning shot soon enough!"
The "shoot first ask questions later" strategy is not
the result of spontaneous actions by scared and edgy
troops. These are orders given the troops from the
Pentagon high command.
"Everyone is now seen as a combatant until proven
otherwise," a Pentagon official is quoted in the
Washington Post of April 1, 2003. The Pentagon recognizes that the shift in tactics will be understood as a brutal
escalation of force against the civilian population and
that their earlier posture as "liberators" will be
exposed. "You'll see acts of kindness, medical care and
the like, but the large scale aid effort will have to
wait," a Pentagon official told the Washington Post. In
fact the new U.S. strategy now is deliberately preventing Iraqi civilians in Nassiriya and other towns from
receiving food and water unless they cooperate with the occupation forces.
U.S. Marine Operations Commander Lt. Colonel Paul Roche told reporters on March 31 that the U.S. strategy towards the people of the city of Nassiriya included the use of
food and water as a weapon to terrorize and break the will of the civilian population.
In the April 1 front page of the Washington Post, the
Pentagon's new strategy is euphemistically referred to in the headline "U.S. troops instructed to use tougher
tactics."
The assault against civilians is being reported in greater detail and honesty by the world media outside the United States. This change in U.S. tactics is, as the following
report shows, encouraging the most racist and homicidal tendencies among U.S. soldiers at the front.
It is important to read the following passage from the UK Times of Sunday, March 30. It reports of a gruesome scene outside of Nassiriya. Some fifteen vehicles, including a
minivan and a couple of trucks, were found destroyed and riddled with bullets by the Times UK reporter Mark
Franchetti:
"Amid the wreckage I counted 12 dead civilians, lying in
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list