[Peace-discuss] Langenheim vs Gill

Ricky Baldwin baldwinricky at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 13 14:43:17 CST 2004


Gill was at the Socialist Forum panel on the
primaries, when the subject of Israel came up and we
were bemoaning the vagueness of all the candidates on
the issue.  All he said was, "I support a two-state
solution."  Even Sharon agrees with that much.

Langenheim did compare Israeli policy toward the
Palestinians to the European settlers' treatment of
Native Americans.  What that means in terms of what
action he'd support, who knows? 

Ricky 
--- Linda Evans <veganlinda at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Randall,
> 
> I'm so glad you brought this up.  I've been
> wondering
> how people feel about Langenheim and Gill.  I have
> been pleasantly surprised by Langenheim's answers to
> a
> wide range of questions on AM580 and other places. 
> Since health care is very important to me, I sort of
> assumed I would like Gill better.
> 
> Although, it seems like Gill is being touted as 'the
> progressive' vote in this race.  I appreciate how
> neither candidate seems to be attacking each other,
> but I don't hear much from them on how they are
> different either.  I don't have a TV so I'm spared
> any
> ads.  I just go by what I hear from the actual
> candidates or in written interviews.  They both are
> vague and that typical political way on some
> questions.
> 
> I'd like to hear from other people on this list who
> may have done more research on these candidates.
> 
> Linda
> 
> 
> --- Randall Cotton <recotton at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Has anyone seen poll numbers on Langenheim vs.
> Gill?
> > (15th district
> > congressional seat, to oppose Tim Johnson)
> > 
> > BTW, although Langenheim is often described as a
> > "conservative" democrat
> > (even in this forum), if you check Project Vote
> > Smart (vote-smart.org),
> > you'll see he's affirmed support for:
> > 
> > 1. eliminating the death penalty (for federal
> > crimes) (Gill did not)
> > 2. Decriminalizing possession of small amounts of
> > marijuana (Gill did not)
> > 3. Much more progressive taxation across the board
> > (Gill only supports
> > increasing taxes on $250,000+, leaving all else as
> > is).
> > 4. Much stronger gun control than Gill
> > 
> > So I'm not sure "conservative democrat" is a fair
> > characterization.
> > 
> > My vote could depend on what poll numbers show,
> thus
> > my query...
> > R
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Peace-discuss mailing list
> > Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> >
>
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
> > 
> 
> 
> =====
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list