[Peace-discuss] Re: Use of peace-discuss list

[John Bambenek]

Wendy, you're one of the few people on this list I could probably have
an intelligent discussion with.

Re-read the progression of e-mails.  My first post was that it was
rally silly to flog a 6 month old OBO article when Leo's not even in
the country anymore. (Yes, Leo's little photoshop was out of line).

Brian then decided to lob the left's favorite criticism of
"hypocrisy", making my private ethics complaint public, and then
slanderously accused me of a McCarthyite witch-hunt in support of the
attempt to kill off poor black people.

Exactly who is ax-grainding here?

On 10/9/06, Wendy Edwards <wedwards at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> Actually, I do have further comment.  Since the email that you're
> apparently referring to went to the peace-discuss list, I saw it
> too.  It definitely did not look like electioneering or solicitation.
> It didn't even look like Girardo spent much time composing it,
> actually.
>
> However, I'm really dismayed by the use of the peace-discuss mailing
> list as a vehicle for frivolous complaints.  As you know, or should
> know, AWARE is an activist group that's not affiliated with any
> candidate for political office (partisan or otherwise).  I don't mind
> you joining the list and baiting people, but I really find the petty
> ax-grinding distasteful.
>
> --Wendy
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:42:05PM -0500, John Bambenek wrote:
> > It's a problem for the University counsel and ethics officer to deal with
> > now.
> >
> > I will not comment further.
> >
>


-- 
j
Part-Time Pundit - http://jcb.pentex-net.com
Owner of BlogSoldiers - http://www.blogsoldiers.com
Asst. Politics Editor of BlogCritics - http://www.blogcritics.org