[Peace-discuss] Re: Use of peace-discuss list

[John Bambenek]

1) As far as I know, the current group has no control over that site.
The use something to the tune of www.illiniobo.com I believe. Sure, it
should be done, hell, it shouldn't have been done regardless.
2) What makes you assume that the peace-discuss archives were used?

On 10/9/06, Wendy Edwards <wedwards at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> As far as flogging the old article, the most salient point in
> my mind is that it's *still* up on the server, publicly
> viewable.  Had it not been, it's unlikely that it would
> have come to the attention of Paul Kotheimer (and
> consequently, the peace-discuss list).
>
> If anything should have been "private," it should have been
> the peace-discuss archives.  Members of AWARE had chosen not
> to allow the list to be archived publicly, precisely because
> they wanted to be able to speak freely.  If you're going to use
> people's posts as ammo against them, I'd say that AWARE indeed
> has a right to know this.
>
> --Wendy
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:16:00PM -0500, John Bambenek wrote:
> > Wendy, you're one of the few people on this list I could probably have
> > an intelligent discussion with.
> >
> > Re-read the progression of e-mails.  My first post was that it was
> > rally silly to flog a 6 month old OBO article when Leo's not even in
> > the country anymore. (Yes, Leo's little photoshop was out of line).
> >
> > Brian then decided to lob the left's favorite criticism of
> > "hypocrisy", making my private ethics complaint public, and then
> > slanderously accused me of a McCarthyite witch-hunt in support of the
> > attempt to kill off poor black people.
> >
> > Exactly who is ax-grainding here?
> >
> > On 10/9/06, Wendy Edwards <wedwards at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> > >Actually, I do have further comment.  Since the email that you're
> > >apparently referring to went to the peace-discuss list, I saw it
> > >too.  It definitely did not look like electioneering or solicitation.
> > >It didn't even look like Girardo spent much time composing it,
> > >actually.
> > >
> > >However, I'm really dismayed by the use of the peace-discuss mailing
> > >list as a vehicle for frivolous complaints.  As you know, or should
> > >know, AWARE is an activist group that's not affiliated with any
> > >candidate for political office (partisan or otherwise).  I don't mind
> > >you joining the list and baiting people, but I really find the petty
> > >ax-grinding distasteful.
> > >
> > >--Wendy
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:42:05PM -0500, John Bambenek wrote:
> > >> It's a problem for the University counsel and ethics officer to deal with
> > >> now.
> > >>
> > >> I will not comment further.
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > j
> > Part-Time Pundit - http://jcb.pentex-net.com
> > Owner of BlogSoldiers - http://www.blogsoldiers.com
> > Asst. Politics Editor of BlogCritics - http://www.blogcritics.org
>


-- 
j
Part-Time Pundit - http://jcb.pentex-net.com
Owner of BlogSoldiers - http://www.blogsoldiers.com
Asst. Politics Editor of BlogCritics - http://www.blogcritics.org