[Peace-discuss] Third parties?

[C. G. Estabrook]

If this is true, why didn't you simply say that you intended to comply 
with the conditions under which I contributed the article when I first 
asked about the matter?  --CGE


illyes at uiuc.edu wrote:
> Folks, I see that this matter has now intruded onto both the UCIMC
> main list and the AWARE discussion list.
> 
> For anyone who hasn't read prior posts on the subject,  there was an
> editorial discussion inside the Public i about whether a paragraph of
> Carl's should best be excluded. The consensus was that it whould be
> kept, but needed some improvement. Before I could discuss this matter
> with Carl, I got email threatening that I would be sued if I changed
> his article without permission. This was strange indeed, since I had
> no such intention, and was an advocate for publicing his article,
> which I found quite good. I have communicated all of this and more to
> Carl.
> 
> I will take questions about this matter at tomorrow's AWARE meeting.
> Show up if you think the Public i has done anything improper. I don't
> think we have.
> 
> Bob _______________________________________________ Peace-discuss
> mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net 
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss