[Peace-discuss] Democrats and nuclear weapons

[C. G. Estabrook]

I think that's right.  Gravel probably belongs on the list with Kucinich 
and Paul.  And people are so appalled at the Democrats' constantly going 
into the tank that people like Richardson are beginning to think that 
edging toward an antiwar position may be the right thing to do. --CGE

n.dahlheim at mchsi.com wrote:
> if Obama's unwillingness to employ nuclear weapons represents some
> kind of enlightened viewpoint, he is far from being a legitimate
> peace candidate.  As far as I can see, only Kucinich and Paul seem to
> be legit. But, they will never be allowed to win.  The corporations
> want more war, and war they shall hav e.
> 
> 
> ----------------------  Original Message:  --------------------- 
> From:    "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu> To:      Peace Discuss
> <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> Subject: [Peace-discuss] Democrats
> and nuclear weapons Date:    Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:52:43 +0000
> 
>> [Obama seems, perhaps inadvertently, to have blurted out something
>>  right, regarding nuclear weapons, and in the process exposed the 
>> horrible conventional assumptions of the usual political scum,
>> notably Hillary Clinton.  --CGE]
>> 
>> Obama Renounces Use of Nuclear Weapons -- Hillary Counters: That's
>> Not the American Way! By SHERWOOD ROSS
>> 
>> Just in time for the 62nd annual observance of the Hiroshima
>> massacre August 6th, Sen. Hillary Clinton(D-N.Y.) has scolded Sen.
>> Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) for stating he would not drop nuclear
>> weapons on civilians. What a wuss that guy is! ...