[Peace-discuss] Provoking war with Iran?

[C. G. Estabrook]

[There's a lot wrong with this -- the US invasion of Vietnam began in 
1962, not 1964, and we know from Seymour Hersh's reporting that the US 
is already conducting military operations inside Iran -- but when 
Democratic presidential candidates are agreeing that “We must not rule 
out using military force” against Iran (Obama), it's important to not e 
a few protests.  --CGE]

	Tonkin Gulf II and the Guns of August?
	By Patrick J. Buchanan

07/17/07 WorldNet Daily -- Is the United States provoking war with Iran, 
to begin while the Congress is conveniently on its August recess?

One recalls that it was in August 1964, after the Republicans nominated 
Barry Goldwater, that the Tonkin Gulf incident occurred.

Twice it was said, on Aug. 2 and Aug. 4, North Vietnamese patrol boats 
had attacked the U.S. destroyers Maddox and Turner Joy in international 
waters. The U.S. Senate responded by voting 88 to 2 to authorize 
President Johnson to assist any Southeast Asian nation whose government 
was threatened by communist aggression.

The bombing of the North began, followed by the arrival of U.S. Marines. 
America's war was on.

As Congress prepares for its August recess, the probability of U.S. air 
strikes on Iran rises with each week. A third carrier, the USS 
Enterprise, and its battle group is joining the Nimitz and Stennis in 
the largest concentration of U.S. naval power ever off the coast of Iran.

And Tonkin Gulf II may have already occurred.

In Baghdad, on July 1, Gen. Kevin J. Bergner charged that Iranians 
planned the January raid in Karbala, using commandos in American-style 
uniforms, that resulted in the death of five U.S. soldiers.

As the New York Times reports, this "marks the first time that the 
United States has charged that Iranian officials have helped plan 
operations against American troops in Iraq and have had advance 
knowledge of specific attacks that have led to the death of American 
soldiers."

The Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards is using Hezbollah to 
train Shiites to attack our soldiers and providing them with enhanced 
IEDs that have killed scores of U.S. troops, Bergner charged. He says we 
have captured a veteran Hezbollah agent and documents pointing to direct 
Iranian complicity in the Karbala raid.

Iran has denounced the charge as "ridiculous." But the Senate has voted 
97-0 to censure Iran for complicity in killing the Americans.

If what Bergner alleges is true, President Bush has not only the right 
but appears to have the blessing of Congress to attack Iran. And he now 
has the naval and air forces at hand. What is stopping him?

For it is surely not Congress, which buried a resolution last spring 
declaring that Bush must come to Congress before taking us into a new 
war in the Middle East. Congress appears to be signaling Bush: "If you 
want to hit Iran, you have the green light. No need to consult us."

Is this yet another abdication by Congress of its moral and 
constitutional duty to decide when and whether America goes to war?

And something smells awfully fishy here.

Iran has no interest in a war with the United States, which it seems to 
be toying with. Iran supports the pro-American Shia regime in Baghdad. 
And the al-Qaida umbrella group in Iraq, which is our mortal enemy, has 
just warned Iran it faces terror attacks if it does not stop supporting 
Shiites in Iraq.

Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who leads the al-Qaida group known as the Islamic 
State in Iraq, says his fighters have been preparing for four years for 
war on Iran:

"We are giving the Persians, and especially the rulers of Iran, a 
two-month period to end all kinds of support for the Iraqi Shiite 
government and to stop direct and indirect intervention – otherwise a 
severe war is waiting for you," al-Baghdadi said in a 50-minute videotape.

Al-Baghdadi also warned Arab Sunnis in the region who do business with 
Shiites in Iran that they were inviting assassination.

Query: If Iran's ally, the Maliki government, is our ally, and if Iran's 
enemy, al-Qaida in Iraq, is our enemy, why would Iran use the Quds Force 
to attack Americans and risk U.S. retaliation?

Killing Americans in Iraq is not going to defeat the United States. But 
it could trigger heavy U.S. retaliation, not only on the Quds Force, but 
on Iran's nuclear facilities – and a war with the United States. Yet 
Iran's diplomatic behavior suggests it wishes to avoid such a war.

Another explanation comes to mind. Iran is not initiating, but is 
responding to U.S.-inspired attacks inside Iran, in the Kurdish north, 
the Arab southwest and the Baluchi southeast of its country. Was Karbala 
an attempted kidnapping to exchange U.S. soldiers for the five Iranian 
"diplomats" we are holding?

Has Bush secretly authorized covert attacks inside Iran? Are U.S. and 
Israeli agents in Kurdistan behind the attacks across the border to 
provoke Iran? On July 11, Iranian troops clashed with Kurd rebels inside 
Iran, and the Iranians fired artillery back into Iraq.

Why is Congress going on vacation? Why are a Democratic-controlled House 
and Senate not asking these questions in public hearings? Why is 
Congress letting Bush and Vice President Cheney decide whether we launch 
a third war in the Middle East?

Or is Congress in on it?

	###