[Peace-discuss] USG plans for Iraq and Iran -- and protesters?

[C. G. Estabrook]

Mark's last post almost seemed coherent, but the moment's passed.


Chas. 'Mark' Bee wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu>
> To: "Chas. 'Mark' Bee" <c-bee1 at itg.uiuc.edu>
> Cc: "Peace Discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] USG plans for Iraq and Iran -- and protesters?
> 
> 
>> Amidst the usual childishness
> 
> lol  Bully anyone with a frivolous lawsuit threat yet today?  Judging by 
> your record, you're overdue.  ;)
> 
> , there are actually some serious points
>> for discussion here.
>>
>> Have you looked at American opinion on the war recently? The Democrats 
>> are frantically tying to make themselves electable by pinning this 
>> immensely unpopular war solely on the Republicans.  The Democrats' 
>> dilemma arises from the fact that they have no intention of abandoning 
>> the policy followed for half a century by all administrations in 
>> regard to Mideast energy resources.
> 
>   More ridiculous overstatement with no backup, as usual. Same for the 
> rest of your deflections. Why not simply admit that what you want is for 
> the Dems to do something politically stupid and put the republicans 
> firmly back into control so you can dispense with the penny ante stuff...?
> 
> http://www.htmlbible.com/abortstats.htm
> 
>   Of course, then your smokescreen of functional irrelevancies like 
> 'vocabulary' and 'culture' might no longer be enough to intimidate your 
> tiny zombie army into allowing you to drive off mainstream democrats 
> interested in becoming involved in AWARE...
> 
>   Say, you know, this overstatement stuff is fun!  I can see why you're 
> hooked.  ;)
> 
> 
>> Chas. 'Mark' Bee wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Why complain?  You apparently are chomping at the bit for the dems to 
>>> make themselves unelectable and put yet another pro war republican in 
>>> the white house in 2008 by pulling everything out of the whole ME 
>>> immediately. Logically, you should pick a republican candidate to 
>>> endorse as the least odious choice should you get your way, and 
>>> prepare your compatriots for resumption of hostilities at that time, 
>>> as well as the end of the entitlement programs the repubs are 
>>> determined to destroy, further restrictions on personal liberties, 
>>> and the eventual devaluation of the dollar to third world currency 
>>> status.
>>>
>>>  Or do you lack the courage to stand up for the logical results of 
>>> your convictions?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss