[Peace-discuss] U.S. House Passes Resolution Apologizing for Slavery

E. Wayne Johnson ewj at pigs.ag
Sat Aug 2 14:14:19 CDT 2008


I think you have appropriately classified me as libertarian and sort of 
anarchist.

"This would reduce society down to a collection of individuals without 
any overarching societal commitment or collective identity."

Since I am fully of age, I choose my commitments and I do not want any 
collective identities imposed upon me, and especially not those 
identities to which I do not subscribe.  I reject imposed collectivism 
as tyrannical but realize that I have to choose what battles I want to 
engage in while maintain my rejection.  I perceive that almost all of 
the time the US Government does not speak for me at all but rather seeks 
to make me a unwilling servant in a system which I definitely did not 
choose or participate in the formation of, and furthermore seems to 
violate its own rules.

LAURIE wrote:
> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; 
> panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; 
> panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; 
> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Consolas; 
> panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:inherit; 
> panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, 
> li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; 
> font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; color:black;} 
> a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; 
> text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
> {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} pre 
> {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char"; 
> margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:10.0pt; 
> font-family:"Courier New"; color:black;} span.HTMLPreformattedChar 
> {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char"; mso-style-priority:99; 
> mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted"; font-family:Consolas; 
> color:black;} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; 
> font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault 
> {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 
> {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.Section1 
> {page:Section1;} -->
>
> >I find it absolutely appalling that the Congress has the gall to make 
> some empty rhetoric about
> >apologizing for one sort of slavery which me and my family never 
> participated in.
>
> Hmmmm!  While I find that I can agree with the rest of your post and 
> with the part of the above statement with respect to empty rhetoric, I 
> find the latter part of the statement very self centered and 
> egotistical.  Supposedly the U.S. government through its various legal 
> bodies and agencies speaks on behalf of the collective society past, 
> present, and future and not for individual persons, specific families, 
> and/or particular private corporations past, present, and/or future.  
> It is irrelevant if you or your family ever participated personally or 
> otherwise.  If it were the case that they could only speak for or on 
> the behalf of those who actually, directly, or actively participated 
> in past events, actions, policies, or practices, then neither I or my 
> family ever participated in the formulation and signing of the 
> Constitution so therefore we should not be bound by it or any of the 
> laws passed by legislators who we did not personally vote for as our 
> personal representatives or laws that we did not participate in the 
> actual formulation and passage.  This would reduce society down to a 
> collection of individuals without any overarching societal commitment 
> or collective identity.  This may be a sort of libertarian anarchist 
> version of society; but it is not the one we claim to operate under as 
> a sovereign nation state.  Even in the state of nature, man always 
> participated in some collectivity even if it was merely a clan based 
> tribal family and identified with that collectivity, its values, 
> norms, practices, and traditions.
>
> *From:* peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net 
> [mailto:peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net] *On Behalf Of *E. 
> Wayne Johnson
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 02, 2008 11:59 AM
> *To:* jencart13 at yahoo.com
> *Cc:* Peace-discuss List
> *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] U.S. House Passes Resolution 
> Apologizing for Slavery
>
> I find it absolutely appalling that the Congress has the gall to make 
> some empty rhetoric about
> apologizing for one sort of slavery which me and my family never 
> participated in.
>
> At the same time no apology should be expected to come forth any time 
> soon for anything meaningful
> such as for continually imposing  on us the forced servitude of 
> collectivism (/which is de facto slavery/),
> for continually eroding our personal liberties,
> for trampling on the Constitution (our By-laws),
> for ignoring the message and intent of the Declaration of Independence 
> (our Charter),
> for taking the fruits of our labour against our will,
> for coercing our children into military service for the purpose of 
> empire-building of by force of law or by force of deception,
> for many other similar insults to life, liberty and pursuit of 
> happiness too numerous to mention,
>
> ...and for making vacuous resolutions.
>
> Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>
> How 'bout apology w/ restitution? Yeah, that'll happen (ditto for 
> Native Americans).
>
>  --Jenifer
>
> --- On *Sat, 8/2/08, E. Wayne Johnson /<ewj at pigs.ag> 
> <mailto:ewj at pigs.ag>/* wrote:
>
>     From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> <mailto:ewj at pigs.ag>
>     Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] U.S. House Passes Resolution
>     Apologizing for Slavery
>     To: "Walter Pituc" <wpituc2 at gmail.com> <mailto:wpituc2 at gmail.com>
>     Cc: "Peace-discuss List" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>     <mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>     Date: Saturday, August 2, 2008, 4:13 AM
>
>     If they really are into apologies with repentance not just being
>     apologists then I have a fairly long grocery list I can dig out
>     for 'em...
>
>     But somehow I don't think this rhetoric accounts for much of
>     anything of substance.
>
>     Walter Pituc wrote:
>
>     The U.S. House of Representations passed a resolution to apologize
>     for slavery on 7/29/2008.
>
>     Wow, about time, eh? Now all we need is an apology for the
>     genocide of Native Americans.
>
>     http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93064166
>
>     http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93059465
>
>     -Walter
>
>       
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>       
>
>      
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Peace-discuss mailing list
>
>     Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>
>     http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>       
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Peace-discuss mailing list
>
>     Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>
>     http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>               
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20080802/97d2edb8/attachment.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list