[Peace-discuss] Re: URGENT! Democracy at WEFT under threat (again)

[mark bee]

Randall Cotton wrote:
> The democratic, community nature of our community radio station, WEFT
> 90.1FM is (once again) under serious threat.
> 
> Background:
> -------------
> Every year, WEFT conducts an election for Board members in which each
> WEFT Member (anyone who contributes $40 or more) is given the
> opportunity to vote by mail-in ballot. Anyone is allowed to run (the
> station Bylaws only require Illinois residency and U.S. citizenship).
> You may remember that last year, the sitting Board of Directors
> tampered with the election by changing the rules in the middle of
> that election.

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


Their action favored the incumbent candidate (the
> Chair of the Board at the time) to the disadvantage of the 5
> challenging candidates.

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


It was the Chair himself who proposed the
> motion to change the rules.

  In order to move business along according to the desires of the Board as a whole, as is his normal function.


> This resulted in a lawsuit by 16 WEFT
> Members that successfully forced the Board to rescind their decision
> as part of an out-of-court settlement. The Chair was ultimately voted
> out of office as part of that same election because of his
> involvement in this matter.

  Actually, because of a hateful lie-filled direct mail campaign undertaken
by Mr. Cotton or his cohorts.


> 
> For reference, the lawsuit is online at:
> 
> www.reformweft.org/lawsuit.pdf
> 
> Though I was heavily involved in the effort to reverse last year's
> tampering, I was not a candidate myself. This year, I did come
> forward as a candidate. And this time, the Board has acted even more
> aggressively to manipulate the election. Last Tuesday evening, May
> 27th, the Board simply voted to bar me from running, even though they
> had already accepted and formally announced my candidacy on May 15th.
> 
> Our community radio station is supposed to be democratically run
> through this democratic election process. The Board is the highest
> governing
> body at the station. For that body to attempt to dictate who may or
> may not run in a Membership-wide election for seats to that very body,
> profoundly harms WEFT's democracy. In this way the integrity of the
> station's democratic foundation and community nature stands to be
> severely compromised.

  In fact, it does not, as Randall Cotton is the only member of WEFT ever to have his volunteer status revoked - as a result of his refusal to meet and discuss his behavior at the station - or to engage in a three year campaign of conspiracy-theory-drenched lies and libel regarding same rather than deal with his disciplinary action and end it amicably.


> 
> My candidacy:
> ---------------
> I decided to run for the Board in this year's election (scheduled to
> start next week) in part to help correct the culture that lead to
> last year's election corruption.

  And again, this corruption claim is a hateful lie concocted by Randall
Cotton, a claim which he can never prove.


 But there are other reasons as well.
> In fact, WEFT has many problem these days

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


 and is quickly losing
> support in the community. We attract donation pledges at less than
> half the rate we did 5 or 6 years ago (and 38% less than even one
> year ago). The candidacy statement I submitted to WEFT provides more
> detail on this and also a rundown of other issues affecting the
> station adversely these days. This statement is online at:
> 
> www.reformweft.org/candidacy.pdf

  And is another list of ridiculous, hateful lies concocted by Randall
Cotton, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


> 
> I complied with all requirements for submitting my candidacy and on
> May 15th, the station formally announced me as a candidate along with
> two others. A copy of this announcement is online at:
> 
> www.reformweft.org/announcement.html

  And, of course, Mr. Cotton was fully aware that his volunteer status was
still revoked when he decided to run.

> 
> My investigative report:
> ------------------------
> 10 days after submitting my candidacy, on May 24th, I published a
> comprehensive report regarding a different serious issue at WEFT that
> motivated my candidacy - the performance and management of the paid
> Underwriting Coordinator. It's a very well-documented investigation of
> the poor performance of the station's Underwriting Coordinator
> position, the ineffective management of that position, and the
> failure of the Board of Directors to correct the situation for more
> than 2 years. The report is about 13 pages long (but with more than
> 120 pages of supporting documentation). The focus of the report
> details precisely how this state of affairs is harming the station
> and its mission. The report is available online at:
> 
> www.reformweft.org/ucreport.pdf

  ..And is another ridiculous example of the incredible lengths
Mr. Cotton has gone to during his three-year campaign of hateful lies.


> 
> Removal of my candidacy:
> ----------------------------
> Three days after I began publicizing that report, on May 27th, at the
> WEFT Board of Directors monthly meeting, the Board went into an
> unannounced "closed session" (Board meetings are generally required
> to be open to the public). During that closed session, the Board
> voted to bar me from running and remove my name from the list of
> candidates.
> 
> Though I have long been speaking out about problems at the station and
> advocating for change (as a Member, Volunteer, Associate and also
> while serving on the Board previously from 2004-2006),

  This is Randall-code for long term passive-agressive harrassment and lie
campaigns - and eventually, tampering with the station and the transmitter
without authorization - against those individuals at WEFT who disagree with
him.  This record resulted in his suspension in late 2005, and a recall vote
being undertaken stationwide by the Associates to remove him from his Board
position, and subsequent failure to be re-elected (while running on
platforms consisting of masses of similar, hateful lies) to the Board by
both the Associates and the Members.


 I believe my
> recent investigative report, released 3 days before I was barred,
> combined with my efforts to help reverse last year's election
> tampering,

  Still, of course, a ridiculous lie, for which no proof will ever be
offered.


contributed heavily to the Board's decision to remove me
> from the election. This action provides a very damaging appearance
> for the Board and severely harms the station's democracy and the
> organization's integrity.

  In fact, it has no effect whatever on anyone who has not had their
volunteer status suspended and refused to fix the situation before
volunteering for the Board.


> 
> What can you do to help?
> --------------------------
> Regardless of whether you've ever contributed to WEFT, the station is
> meant to serve the community as a public service. Anyone in the
> community has the legitimacy to communicate their reaction regarding
> this decision to the Board. You can send mail to boardchair at weft.org
> to formally register your opinion and urge the Board to reverse their
> decision before the ballots are mailed out on June 5th. Given that
> the Chair has been the primary advocate for this action, however, I
> would also suggest sending a copy of your communication to
> weft-comm at curadio.net so that it is documented publicly. weft-comm is
> an open, public community mailing list that was set up to discuss
> issues regarding WEFT (it was recently set up independently from the
> station after WEFT's management shut down the station's only open
> discussion mailing list, "wefta").
> 
> You can also subscribe to the weft-comm at curadio.net mailing list and
> join in discussion regarding this and other station matters by
> visiting www.curadio.net on the web.
> 
> Thanks for your attention to this issue and I hope you'll take action
> to oppose what's going on. Not because it's a matter of unfairness to
> me personally. That is not the issue and is of no significance (by
> the way, Board seats are not paid positions and are not compensated
> in any way). The issue is the damage being brought against what is
> supposed to be and what we've all understood to be a community media
> resource, democratically run by its paying Members.

  Such damage being, once again, a figment of the fevered vengeful
imagination of one Randall Cotton, for which no real proof will ever be
offered.


> 
> Indeed, WEFT's Bylaws encompass many democratic provisions, not just
> this election. And democratic control of public access to media
> channels is already in a desperately poor state in this country.
> Community media channels provide an invaluable alternative to
> increasingly monolithic and conglomerated corporate media and are
> only becoming more important and precious with time.
> 
> But for years, the current leadership at WEFT has been closing the
> station in on itself,

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


> erecting walls instead of reaching out,

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


> becoming more and more insular and self-serving.

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


 And there have been
> serious management problems that are being ignored

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


 (the matter of the
> Underwriting Coordinator I delineate in my report is hardly the worst
> of it).

   A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


Now the leadership is engaging in a direct and quite
> undemocratic attempt to control who may or may not join that
> leadership. If this is allowed to stand, it will set a horrible
> precedent,

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


 deal a severe blow to the community nature of this
> important public media access service and institution,

   A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


and turn WEFT
> into even more of an insider's club than it already is.

  A ridiculous lie, for which no real proof will ever be offered.


> 
> There are other ways you can help - please contact me IMMEDIATELY
> for details if you're interested. Immediate action is necessary due to
> election-related deadlines - the deadline to gain voting eligibility
> is tomorrow, Saturday May 31st and the ballots are scheduled to be
> mailed out to WEFT Members on Thursday, June 5th . Please feel free
> to reply to me directly via email or, if you prefer, call me any day,
> any time between 7:30AM and 1AM regarding this matter at 217-351-8644
> (home) or 217-722-8470 (cell).

  And be prepared for the usual obsessively planned and shaped
propagandistic lie campaign against anyone and everyone at WEFT who had to
be involved in stopping Randall's reign of error, both back in 2005 and ever
since.  Mr. Cotton will of course omit his own behavior, which extends from
destructively modifying the station's $25,000 remodeling project without
authorization to vengefully discussing the living arrangements of a female
Board member on the main station list.


> 
> Randall Cotton


  Why didn't you resolve your volunteer suspension when you had chance after
chance - during the three years you chose instead to lie and defame the
Board and Committee Chairs who were forced to vote on it - to do so. Mr.
Cotton?