[Peace-discuss] Torture referendum
John W.
jbw292002 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 11:53:54 CDT 2008
At 11:00 AM 3/31/2008, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>John, your estimate of your fellow-citizens' intelligence is as always
>unnecessarily low.
All I can tell you, Carl - trying to remain civil here - is that I myself
had to read the fucking thing about 5 times to understand what it
said. The bill would have PROHIBITED the CIA from using torture - a
negative. Bush vetoed the bill - a double negative. Johnson apparently
voted to override Bush's veto - either a triple negative, or a
double-double negative, depending on how you look at it. I had to read it
about 5 times, and break it down into its component parts just as I have
here, to determine whether Johnson was for or against torture, and I'm
still not 100% positive. I think he wants to prohibit the CIA from
employing torture, but I'm not sure.
The reason why I asked if Johnson supported the actual anti-torture bill in
the first place is (a) because of my confusion in reading your draft
referendum, and (b) if so, why not just say THAT? Something like, "Given
Representative Timothy Johnson's support for a bill outlawing torture,
which was vetoed by pResident Bush...." ?
But you do what you like. You're a professor. You know everything about
everything. Why, I'll bet there are a couple of studies that prove
empirically in a statistically significant manner that my fellow citizens
are more intelligent, more informed, more patient in reading obscure,
pedantic referenda than I think they are!
>Two corrections: the draft sentence should of course end with a question
>mark, and the meeting is not this Tuesday but next. --CGE
>
>
>
>John W. wrote:
>
>>At 06:16 PM 3/30/2008, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>>
>>>Here's a draft of a referendum to be proposed at the Champaign Township
>>>annual meeting Tuesday night:
>>>
>>>"Noting that Representative Timothy Johnson voted to override President
>>>Bush's veto of a bill that would have prohibited the CIA from using
>>>torture, shall the citizens of Champaign Township urge our congressional
>>>representatives to renew their efforts to pass such a bill."
>>
>>How many Peace-discuss readers think that this sentence is way too
>>complex and convoluted for the average reader?
>>Did (and does) Tim Johnson support the actual anti-torture bill?
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list