[Peace-discuss] What a surprise...

[C. G. Estabrook]

	From Times Online
	April 9, 2009
	General Ray Odierno: we may have to ignore
	Iraq deadline to halt al-Qaeda terror
	Deborah Haynes in Baghdad

The activities of al-Qaeda in two of Iraq’s most troubled cities could keep US 
combat troops engaged beyond the June 30 deadline for their withdrawal, the top 
US commander in the country has warned.

US troop numbers in Mosul and Baqubah, in the north of the country, could rise 
rather than fall over the next year if necessary, General Ray Odierno told The 
Times in his first interview with a British newspaper since taking over from 
General David Petraeus in September.

He said that a joint assessment would be conducted with the Iraqi authorities in 
the coming weeks before a decision is made.

Combat troops are due to leave all Iraqi cities by the end of June. Any delay 
would be a potential setback for President Obama, who has pledged to withdraw 
all combat forces from Iraq by August 2010 as he switches his focus to Afghanistan.

The ultimate decision on keeping or withdrawing troops would be taken by Nouri 
al-Maliki, the Iraqi Prime Minister, handing him a big dilemma, given the desire 
by most Iraqis for the US military to leave the country.

Tens of thousands of supporters of Moqtada al-Sadr, the antiAmerican Shia 
cleric, marched through Baghdad yesterday, the sixth anniversary of the fall of 
the capital, to demand the withdrawal of US forces.

General Odierno, 54, said that he was also concerned about the risk of renewed 
conflict between Arabs and Kurds in northern Iraq, where tensions are rising 
over the ownership of territory. He also cited the “very dangerous” threat posed 
by Iranian-funded militants, who appear to be styling themselves on Lebanon’s 
Hezbollah.

General Odierno, a bald, imposing 6ft 5in, was speaking as he sat outside the 
back of the Saddam-era mansion that he calls home, next to a man-made lake on a 
military base in Baghdad. Touching on a range of issues, he said that he was not 
worried by a recent spate of deadly bombings against Shia targets blamed on 
al-Qaeda. He said they were designed to coincide with key dates such as the 
anniversary of Baghdad’s fall and rejected the idea that they signalled a fresh 
round of sectarian war.

The general has long experience of Iraq: he arrived in April 2003, after the 
invasion, and led the US division that was ultimately responsible for capturing 
Saddam Hussein; he was No 2 to General Petraeus in 2007; and is now on his third 
tour in charge of the American withdrawal.

Under an agreement between Washington and Baghdad, all 140,000 US troops must be 
out by the end of 2011.

Despite the rise in the number of attacks, overall violence is still far below 
levels of two years ago when the surge of an extra 30,000 US forces – a strategy 
created and implemented by General Odierno and his boss, General Petraeus – was 
just getting started. That risk paid off, subduing a civil war that was killing 
thousands of Iraqi civilians and scores of American soldiers every month.

General Odierno said that his darkest days in Iraq were when he was in charge of 
day-to-day combat operations in 2007. During that 15-month tour he signed 
hundreds of letters of condolence to the parents of service-men and women from 
the US, Britain and other coalition countries. “I always felt [the surge] would 
[succeed] but those were the times when you were wondering whether this will 
work or not,” he said.

The war touched him more than most commanders. “The toughest day was the day I 
got called that my son was injured over here,” he said. Tony Odierno, then an 
army lieutenant, lost an arm in a rocket attack in 2004.

The US commander was confident that the overall timetable for the US pullout 
would be met. But he added that US combat troops might have to stay beyond June 
30 in Mosul and Baqubah, where al-Qaeda retains an active presence. “The two 
areas I am concerned with are Mosul and then Baqubah and [other] parts of Diyala 
province,” he said. “We will conduct assessments and provide our assessments 
when the time is right.”

He added that over the next 12 months “we won’t see a large reduction in any 
forces in Mosul or Diyala. In fact we might see reinforcements in those areas if 
we continue to have issues”. Another flashpoint is the ethnically divided city 
of Kirkuk, on the border of Iraqi Kurdistan, where Arabs and Kurds are at 
loggerheads. Provincial elections were delayed there because of a disagreement 
over ownership of the city, a row that also covers towns and villages scattered 
along the border.

The general agreed that there was a risk of conflict in those areas. “We can’t 
allow politics, we can’t allow pride, we can’t allow ego to cause violence to 
occur when you can solve a problem with dialogue.”

He said that he was also keeping an eye on Iranian-backed Shia militants who are 
fewer in number compared with two years ago but restructuring into groups with a 
political and military wing, similar to Hezbollah.

A MILITARY LEADER WHO COMMANDS RESPECT

“One of the most effective military leaders of his generation”

Defence Secretary Robert Gates, speaking in February 2008

“He went through a complete metamorphosis. He educated himself and became the 
preeminent operational commander we have in conducting irregular warfare”

Retired General Jack Keane, who worked closely with General Odierno on the surge

“He really just wanted to play football, serve his five years and get out of the 
army. But he hurt his knee and never got the chance”

Linda Odierno, his wife, in an interview with the Baltimore Sun

“I appreciate the fact that you really snatched defeat out of the jaws of those 
who were trying to defeat us in Iraq”

George W. Bush, thanking General Odierno in March 2008

Source: Times database



President Barack Obama is seeking $83.4 billion for US military and diplomatic 
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, pressing for special troop funding that he 
opposed two years ago when he was a senator and George W. Bush was President. Mr 
Obama’s request, including money to send thousands more troops into Afghanistan, 
would push the costs of the two wars to almost $1 trillion since the September 
11, 2001, terror attacks against the US, according to the Congressional Research 
Service.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article6069734.ece