[Peace-discuss] Israel and Aid…

David Green davegreen84 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 24 13:00:36 CDT 2010


Mort, I need to write another article that puts all this in a clearer context, but, building on Carl's questions, the questions remain:

1. How does supporting unprincipled behavior on behalf of U.S "interests" help to support principled behavior on behalf of the Palestinians?

2. Can principled (right, just) outcomes come from an unprincipled analysis?

3. Is it even pragmatically worthwhile to argue the Palestinians case on the basis of U.S. "interests."?

My answers are: it doesn't, no, and no.

It's become commonplace, but this sort of careless argument has to be seen as more a syndrome than a symptom when coming from someone like Nader. Why do "progressives" feel like they have to jump at the chance to support their arguments with evidence from someone like Petraeus? Does the case for Palestinian rights depend on its utility in providing for a safer environment for American occupiers in Iraq and Aghanistan?

Again, this will be explored in a longer format.

DG


________________________________
From: Morton K. Brussel <brussel at illinois.edu>
To: C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu>
Cc: Peace-discuss List <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
Sent: Wed, March 24, 2010 12:10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Israel and Aid…

I think your questions are all irrelevant to what Nader hopes to bring to the attention of the populace. He tries to show that Israel is undeserving of support from the USA.  Nader is not the radical you would want him to be, but his heart is in the right place, and his ideas are worth considering. Aside from this, he is appalled at what Israel policy has wreaked in the Middle East. You are prone to ignore all that.

--mkb

On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:21 AM, C. G. Estabrook wrote:

> The questions are,
> 
> [1] Is Israel diverting US policy makers from pursuing the national interest?
> 
> [2] Is the national interest as understood by US policy makers something to be pursued?
> 
> [3] Is the national interest so understood in fact in the interest of most Americans?
> 
> The answer to all three is, "No."
> 
> 
> ===
> On Tue Mar 23 2010 Brussel Morton K. <mkbrussel at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Useful remarks to try to change the atmosphere… Nader clearly doesn't believe that the U.S. head wagging the Israeli tail.
> 
>     Published on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 by CommonDreams.org
>     Israel & Aid
>     by Ralph Nader
>     [...]
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss



      
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100324/824781cc/attachment.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list