[Peace-discuss] [Discuss] [CentralILJwJ] Fw: Fw: What hath got rot?

[C. G. ESTABROOK]

We all fit her description?  Lucky us.


Marti Wilkinson wrote:
> I don't see where Melodye was making any personal remarks directed towards
> any one individual so I'm simply commenting at this point to come to her
> defense. If anything I feel that she is pointing out that many of us, myself
> included, come into these conversations/discussions with a degree of
> privilege and that we can't always separate that from our activism. In fact,
> trying to do so actually can be more harmful than helpful. Overall, this
> 'discussion' has been a good reminder for me as to why I removed my name from
> some of these listserves :D
> 
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, C. G. ESTABROOK <cge at shout.net 
> <mailto:cge at shout.net>> wrote:
> 
> Don't be too hard on Ms. Rosales.  I think she thought that she was making a 
> political comment, however inappropriate it was.
> 
> 
> Tristan B wrote:
> 
> Can we keep personal conversations between whoever is part of them?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, C. G. Estabrook <cge at shout.net 
> <mailto:cge at shout.net> <mailto:cge at shout.net <mailto:cge at shout.net>>> wrote:
> 
> This is getting a bit creepy, Melodye.
> 
> Am I to understand that someone emailed you with observations about my net 
> worth - and you posted them - because of things I'd written about politics?
> 
> 
> 
> Melodye Rosales wrote:
> 
> Oops!  Did I say a quarter of a million?  I misspoke----someone privately 
> emailed to correct me------Correction to previous email:
> 
> Silly me----I meant to say, more than a half-million (conservative estimate) 
> in C-U property alone ----add to that personal assets, medical insurance 
> packages from the University times two, University pension packages times 
> two----  So, I guess that makes their combined package putting them in the 
> (or close to---or above) millionaires?
> 
> just clarifying...


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.