[Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] Fw: [Peace] News from Neptune for 14March 2014

[Stephen Francis]

To all members of OccupyCU and peace-discuss lists:

Well maybe its an appropriate time for my return to these discussion lists. I've been quietly studying, building new relationships and have helped organize a new conference.  (more below)  I noticed in the conversation below my name appeared a number of times in the context of accusations that I'm 'anti-semitic' and a neo-Nazi sympathizer.  I would like to address those accusations.

The word anti-Semitic now is irrelevant to me because I've finally discovered its dubious creation (Semites are mostly Arabs and do not include a European / Asiatic lineage of Khazarian Jews, Oxford Journals, Eran Elhaik) and only reminds me that its users are desperately trying to distract and change the subject with semantic trickery and ad hominem attacks.   I will be submitting an Letter to the Editor about this soon.

I'll have to admit that last fall I mistakenly posted some comments about a clearly neo-Nazi propaganda video that I naively did not recognize as such, but have studied the issue much more since then and am now convinced that the strong relationship between Neocons and Neo-Nazis is far more important than Israel apologists' efforts to portray holocaust revisionists (as I am) as neo-Nazi sympathizers (of which I am not).  

The recent events in Ukraine provide a good example of what I'm talking about. I still follow Wayne Madsen very closely and here are some of his latest comments about Neocon / Neo-Nazi collaboration that provide clarification.  I would be interested in anyone's rebuttal (with objective facts included) to his view of what is happening in Ukraine.

WayneMadsenReport. "WMR previously reported that the neo-Nazi units in Kiev and elsewhere were armed with the Russian-made Libyan weapons to make it appear that it was Russian troops who were killing Ukrainians. These same Russian-made Libyan weapons may be used in future "false flag" attacks that will be blamed on the Russian government.
Just as in Syria, where Saudi and Israeli intelligence and military forces are assisting Al Qaeda-linked elements to overthrow President Bashar al Assad in a bloody civil war, Israeli Defense Force veterans in Kiev joined hands with Chechen Islamist guerrillas, in addition to neo-Nazi units to help overthrow the government of President Viktor Yanukovych. An Israeli Defense Force veteran codenamed "Delta" led a unit called the "Blue Helmets of Maidan" in battling Ukrainian security forces. "Delta" led a 40-man unit consisting of other ex-IDF members. Delta defended the main neo-Nazi political party, Svoboda, stating that claims that the party and its members are anti-Semitic are "exaggerated." Opposition fighters wounded in Kiev received medevaced to Israel, a clear sign that the Israeli government supported the coup against Yanukovych.
The leader of the neo-Nazi Right Sector party, Dmitry Yarosh, coordinated support for the coup leaders in Ukraine from the Al Qaeda-linked Caucasus Emirate of Doku Umarov, the Chechen terrorist who is responsible for deadly attacks that have killed hundreds of people in Russia. Chechen government officials, including Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov, confirmed that Yarosh was working with Umarov loyalists inside Ukraine. Chechen intelligence officers picked up on the coordination between Yarosh and the Caucasus Emirate by monitoring postings on the social networking site VKontakte."

And here are some links that I rely on to help clarify my understanding of Wayne's views. Global Research How and Why the U.S. Government Aided a Coup Led by Neo-Nazis in Ukraine and... or historically go back to Prescott Bush's financial ties to the Nazis, or Paul Wolfowitz - the leading "Straussian" in the Bush administration and Leo Strauss' who was dogged by accusations of being a 'Nazi Jew' whose core beliefs were foremost influenced by Nietzche, the single most influential thinker of conservatism of the nineteenth century.

And this article in ADL 'Demonizing Israel: The Anti-Israel Movement's Exploitation of the Holocaust' explains the concept and from an obviously pro-Israel point of view, of which cutting through the propaganda and twisted logic is relatively easy.

I think we have much more to worry about in considering the real Neocon / Neo-Nazi threat than the academically diligent holocaust, JFK assassination or 9/11 Truth researchers who are trying to untangle all the propaganda from the real events that have shaped or are shaping our civilization.

With that in mind I introduce the upcoming: Conference: Academic Freedom  Are there Limits to Inquiry?
I think the best way to describe the conference is to refer to James Fetzer's VeteransToday article on the conference.  This conference is focused on the concept of academic freedom and the process of inquiry in the academic community not the details of the events that brought about its conception.

VeteransToday article

Noam Chomsky, temporary faculty and the future of academic freedom
By Jim Fetzer
 
While I have severely criticized Noam Chomsky, whom I regard as a left-wing gatekeeper on the major issues of our time, including the assassination of JFK and the atrocities of 9/11–where he dismisses conspiracy theories about the former on the ground that his death involved no major policy issues and on the latter that it looks to him as though typical bureaucratic blundering let it happen–he has recently madeastute observations about the demise of tenure at American universities.
The institution of tenure, which grants faculty a permanent position within the university, was intended to insulate those who take on complex, controversial and politically loaded issues, such as JFK and 9/11, to be secure from retaliation by administrations who are subservient to the influence of their boards of trustees and the typically more conservative community at large.
The protection that tenure provides has been gradually waning of later, however, because more and more institutions of higher learning are adopting a business model, where cost-benefit calculations are made on the basis of dollars and cents rather than truth and evidence. When there are fewer and fewer tenured positions, there are fewer and fewer faculty who are willing to engage in controversial issues, where the very institutions on which the public depends for objectivity and rationality, much like the mass media today, no longer serve the public interest as they were originally envisioned.

YouTube - Veterans Today -
Thus, as Chomsky has observed, there has been a distinct trend toward hiring temporary (or “adjunct”) faculty in lieu of those on tenure-tracks, which has been a boon for the bottom line but a major loss for society:
That’s part of the business model. It’s the same as hiring temps in industry or what they call “associates” at Wal-Mart, employees that aren’t owed benefits. It’s a part of a corporate business model designed to reduce labor costs and to increase labor servility. When universities become corporatized, as has been happening quite systematically over the last generation as part of the general neoliberal assault on the population, their business model means that what matters is the bottom line. The effective owners are the trustees (or the legislature, in the case of state universities), and they want to keep costs down and make sure that labor is docile and obedient. The way to do that is, essentially, temps.
>. . . [W]hen Alan Greenspan was testifying before Congress in 1997 on the marvels of the economy he was running, he said straight out that one of the bases for its economic success was imposing what he called “greater worker insecurity.” If workers are more insecure, that’s very “healthy” for the society, because if workers are insecure they won’t ask for wages, they won’t go on strike, they won’t call for benefits; they’ll serve the masters gladly and passively. And that’s optimal for corporations’ economic health. At the time, everyone regarded Greenspan’s comment as very reasonable, judging by the lack of reaction and the great acclaim he enjoyed.
>Well, transfer that to the universities: how do you ensure “greater worker insecurity”? Crucially, by not guaranteeing employment, by keeping people hanging on a limb than can be sawed off at any time, so that they’d better shut up, take tiny salaries, and do their work; and if they get the gift of being allowed to serve under miserable conditions for another year, they should welcome it and not ask for any more. That’s the way you keep societies efficient and healthy from the point of view of the corporations. And as universities move towards a corporate business model, precarity is exactly what is being imposed. And we’ll see more and more of it.
Very much like the use of part time employees who are deliberately not given enough work hours to have benefits (such as vacation time, retirement benefits or potential bonuses), the use of adjunct faculty makes it far cheaper for universities to conduct their business and enhance their profit margins. But they become less and less responsive to the crucial need of society for objective and unbiased analyses of the problems that the people confront, whether that entails understanding the economy, accurate employment figures, the pluses and minuses of adopting different public policies–or the truth about JFK, 9/11 or other complex and controversial topics, such as what did and did not happen during World War II.

YouTube - Veterans Today -
Conference: “Academic Freedom: Are there Limits to Inquiry?”
 
A conference entitled, “Academic Freedom: Are there Limits to Inquiry?”, will be held at the University of Illinois UC, Illini Union, Room 314A, from 9 AM-6 PM/CT on 26 April 2014. The idea for this conference originated with Stephen Francis, who also organized The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference, which was held at the Urbana Free Library on 22 September 2013, featuring Kevin Barrett, Jim Fetzer and Wayne Madsen as speakers. See “The Complete Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference” on Veterans Today.
Stephen Francis
As presently envisioned, registration will be held from 9 AM-10 AM/CT, with Kevin Barrett presenting the first lecture from 10 AM-11:00 AM/CT, followed by Cary Nelson from 11 AM to Noon/CT. The lunch break from Noon-1 PM/CT will be followed by a presentation by Rima Kapitan from 1-2 PM/CT, which will in turn be followed by Nick Kollerstrom from 2-3 PM/CT. Since Nick resides in London, he will join us via Skype. Jim Fetzer will speak from 3-4 PM/CT, with a panel discussion and questions and debate with the audience from 4-6.
Three of the speakers–Barrett, Kollerstrom, and Fetzer–have had experience as faculty with complex and controversial issues, while two of us–Nelson and Kapitan–are professionals who are involved with academic freedom issues in relation to the faculty and their clients. By focusing on three “hot” topics, JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust, they aim at sharpening public understanding of what should be expected of colleges and university. In particular, they will address, “Are there limits to what faculty can research?” and “Are there limits to what they can teach?”, where these speakers appear to be especially well-positioned to address these extremely important but themselves sensitive subjects.
SCHEDULED SPEAKERS:
Kevin Barrett, Ph.D.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. In the early 1990s, Barrett received master’s degrees in both English literature and French from San Francisco State University. He received a Ph.D. in African languages and literature with a minor in folklore from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2004.
He has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. He is co-editor of 9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out (2007) and the author of Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie (2007) and of Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters (2009).
Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in The New York Times, Christian Science Monitor, Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. He ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host. His web sites include VeteransToday/Barrett, TruthJihad, TruthJihadRadio and MUJCA (Muslim Christian Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth).
Cary Nelson, Ph.D.
Cary Nelson received a B.A. from Antioch College in Ohio (1967) and a Ph.D. from the University of Rochester in New York (1970). Since 1970, has taught modern poetry and literary theory at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he is Jubilee Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences and Professor of English.
His twenty-five books include Higher Education Under Fire: Politics, Economics, and the Crisis of the Humanities (1994), Will Teach for Food: Academic Labor in Crisis (1997),Academic Keywords: A Devil’s Dictionary for Higher Education (1999), Revolutionary Memory: Recovering the Poetry of the American Left (2001), and Office Hours : Activism and Change in the Academy (2004).
Cary has been concerned with issues of academic freedom and tenure, especially having served as the 2nd Vice President of the American Association of University Professors from 2000-06, and as the President of the AAUP 2006-2012.
Rima Kapitan, J.D.
Rima is the owner of Kapitan Law Office in Chicago, IL. Her practice consists primarily of litigation on behalf of employees and advising of businesses on employment law matters. In recent years she has increasingly focused on academic cases, representing employees in appeals of tenure denials and employment litigation in free speech and discrimination cases.
She has spoken on the topic of academic freedom at conferences of the American Association of University Professors, the Illinois AAUP and California State University- Fresno. She has served as a judge at the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition.
Ms. Kapitan is a graduate of DePaul University College of Law and Indiana University’s Individualized Major Program. She was admitted to practice by the State of Illinois Supreme Court in 2005 and is a member of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern, Central and Southern Districts of Illinois.
Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D.
Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., has two history of science degrees, one from Cambridge 1968, plus a PhD from London, 1995. He was an honorary member of staff of UCL for 11 years.
He co-edited The Case Against War (Spokesman, 2004) comprising the CND legal arguments against the Iraq war) and then co-organized the Belgrano Inquiry in 1986, publishing The Unnecessary War (1998) as its proceedings.
In 2008 he received widespread publicity and ethical damnation for his interest in studies of the residual cyanide levels found in walls of the WWII labor-camps.
His recent book, Terror on the Tube (3rd ed., 2011) is the most comprehensive account of the 2005 London bombings. It supports the conclusion that this was a “false flag” attack.
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.
Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.
The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010). Since his retirement, he has devoted himself to dealing with the most complex and controversial events of recent history on “The Real Deal” and in his articles on Veterans Today.
UPDATE: Additional speaker announced
 
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D.
Winfield Abbe received an A.B. degree in physics from the University of California Berkeley, M.S. in physics from California State University at Los Angeles and Ph.D. in physics from the University of California Riverside. His main areas of research are low temperature solid state physics and theoretical elementary particle physics.
He has also spent some time working on the long standing problem of Fermat’s Last Theorem which was recently solved, but the esoteric solution is known and understood by only a handful of people in the world. Dr. Abbe was a faculty member at the University of Georgia, Athens and an Institute of Science and Technology Fellow at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
During his career in academe, he has observed gross abuses senior faculty have administered to junior and the deterioration of the practice of academic freedom, which he looks forward to addressing during the conference.
________________________________

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a journalist and editor for Veterans Today.
Related Posts:
	* Interview with Philosopher of Science Dr. James Henry Fetzer
	* The War on Truth: Research on the Holocaust can End your Career
	* Guilty demeanor: The private 9/11 emails of Noam Chomsky
	* Chomsky covers up world’s worst-ever war crime
	* Conspiracies – not “conspiracy theories” – are destroying democracy
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=291663

Thank you,
Steve Francis




On Saturday, March 15, 2014 5:01 PM, David Johnson <davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net> wrote:
 



> Don't you love how appologists for the neo-fascist racist / apartheid 
> government of Israel, always want to accuse everyone who questions or 
> criticize the policies of the Israeli government as " anti-semetic ".
> Or in the case of people of Jewish decent ; " self-hating Jews ".
>
> This indicates their
 lack of credibility and moral arguement on the issues 
> concerning the Middle East.
>
> David Johnson
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "C. G. Estabrook" <carl at newsfromneptune.com>
> To: "David Gehrig" <david-cu at nukulele.org>
> Cc: "ya'aQov" <yaaqovz at gmail.com>; <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; "occupycu" 
> <occupyCU at lists.chambana.net>; "SJP UIUC" <sjp.uiuc at gmail.com>; "Peace 
> Discuss" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] [Peace] News from Neptune for 
> 14March 2014
>
>
> I neither know nor care very much whether Steve Francis is an anti-Semite. 
> He may well be.
>
> What's your position on the (much more serious) issue sketched below?
>
> Do you agree with me, or with the editors of CounterPunch?
>
> --CGE
>
> On Mar 15, 2014, at 2:54 PM, David Gehrig <david-cu at nukulele.org> wrote:
>
>> So sez Carl "I Let Holocaust Deniers Play Me Like a Piano, But I'd Rather 
>> Not Discuss It Because That Would Require Admitting It"
 Estabrook.
>>
>> Carl, here is the direct question all your furious rhetorical aerobatics 
>> have failed to get off your tail. Do you finally accept that I attacked 
>> Steve Francis as an antisemite because he IS an antisemite, one you 
>> passionately defended again and again without quite getting around to the 
>> "oops" once he tipped his hand (forward at arms length at an upward 
>> angle)? Because if that's the case, it's time for a you-a maxima culpa 
>> you've never quite managed to deliver.
>>
>> Quick, Carl, to the Bloviotron! You must make new deflective/distractive 
>> measures!
>>
>> @%<
>>
>>> On Mar 15,
 2014, at 11:05 AM, "C. G. Estabrook" 
>>> <carl at newsfromneptune.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is an actual issue here, obscured as it is by David's amusing 
>>> hysterics.
>>>
>>> It's the difference between Mearsheimer and Walt on the one hand and 
>>> Chomsky on the other. The editors of Counterpunch incline to the former, 
>>> I to the latter.
>>>
>>> Roughly put, M-W see the Israeli government dominating US policy, 
>>> against "American interests." (Their 2007 book, "The Isreal Lobby and 
>>> U.S. Foreign Policy," even contends that the invasion of Iraq had 
>>> nothing to do with control of energy resources but only to do with 
>>> "Israeli interests" - which seems to me obviously false.)
>>>
>>> "But recognizing that M-W took a courageous stand, which merits praise, 
>>> we still have to ask how convincing their thesis is. Not
 very, in my 
>>> opinion. I've reviewed elsewhere what the record (historical and 
>>> documentary) seems to me to show about the main sources of US ME policy, 
>>> in books and articles for the past 40 years, and can't try to repeat 
>>> here. M-W make as good a case as one can, I suppose, for the power of 
>>> the Lobby, but I don't think it provides any reason to modify what has 
>>> always seemed to me a more plausible interpretation. Notice incidentally 
>>> that what is at stake is a rather subtle matter: weighing the impact of 
>>> several factors which (all agree) interact in determining state policy: 
>>> in particular, (A) strategic-economic interests of concentrations of 
>>> domestic power in the
 tight state-corporate linkage, and (B) the Lobby." 
>>> {Chomsky at <http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20060328.htm>].
>>>
>>> Jeffrey Blankfort (a friend of the late Cockburn's, whom CP continues to 
>>> publish) has an extreme form of the former view; perhaps Norman 
>>> Finkelstein can be said to have an extreme form of the latter.
>>>
>>> In an interview in September 2010, Chomsky said - accurately, I think -
>>>
>>> 'There is an interesting mythology that I have opposed the BDS movement. 
>>> In reality, as explained over and over, I not only support it but was 
>>>
 actively involved long before the "movement" took shape. BDS is, of 
>>> course, a tactic. That should be understood. Norman Finkelstein warned 
>>> recently that it sometimes appears to be taking on cult-like features. 
>>>
 That should be carefully avoided. Like all tactics, particular 
>>> implementations have to be judged on their own merits. Here there is 
>>> room for legitimate disagreement. I have been opposed to certain 
>>> implementations, particularly those that are very likely to harm the 
>>> victims, as unfortunately has happened.
>>>
>>> '...It is convenient, particularly for Westerners, to regard it as an 
>>> "anti-Israel movement." There are obvious temptations to blaming someone 
>>> else, but the fact of the matter is that Israel can commit crimes to the 
>>> extent that they are given decisive support by the US, and less 
>>> directly, its allies. BDS actions are both principled and most effective 
>>> when they are directed at our crucial contribution to these crimes, 
>>> without which they would end; for
 example, boycott of western firms 
>>> contributing to the occupation, working to end military aid to Israel, 
>>> etc.'
>>>
>>> That's the point that should direct our own political work - "Israel can 
>>> commit crimes to the extent that they are given decisive support by the 
>>> US." Our job is to inform Americans about what is being done in their 
>>> name by the US government. "It is not simply that most people don’t know 
>>> what’s going on, but they don’t even know that they don’t know." 
>>> Cockburn and Counterpunch have done yeoman service in changing that.
>>>
>>> --CGE
>>>
>>>> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:11 AM,
 David Gehrig <david-cu at nukulele.org> 
>>>>
 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Estabrook's admiration for "Counterpunch" goes a long way toward
>>>> explaining how a neo-neo-Nazi like Steve Francis could dribble him so
>>>> humiliatingly up and down the court like a basketball, with Carl
>>>> insisting "I'm in perfect control of the situation" at each bounce.
>>>>
>>>> When you're Counterpunchdrunk, even *considering* the possibility that
>>>> a critic of Israel is also an antisemite is absolute and complete
>>>> capitulation to Bibi, must never never never be done, and everything
>>>> possible must be done to shout down anyone who tries to point it out,
>>>> even when it's flashing in neon letters like
 Francis's was all along.
>>>>
>>>> The Counterpunch coin has only one side: be as antisemitic as you
>>>>
 want, use what antisemitic memes you want, expound what antisemitic
>>>> conspiracies you want, but as long as you've mentioned the word
>>>> "zionist" somewhere in there at least once, then the antisemitism is
>>>> all magically lifted away, and Carl Estabrook is your bestest bestest
>>>> friend.
>>>>
>>>> People like Francis know this, too. They know that they can trust on
>>>> the Carls of the world to fall right in line. They know the last thing
>>>> they have to fear is critical examination of their antisemitism from
>>>> the Carls of the world.
>>>>
>>>> And that's how you end up looking the way Carl did, having to pretend
>>>> at every turn that the criticism of Francis's obvious and blatant
>>>> antisemitism was all a dodge and a fake - right up until
 Francis
>>>> started waving Die Fahne Hoch, when Carl suddenly went vewwy vewwy
>>>> quiet, never quite getting around to uttering "ooops."
>>>>
>>>> But, you know, that really was the best poor Carl could do, given that
>>>> his trustiest periscope into the issue, Cockburn, is so cracked.
>>>>
>>>> @%<
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:20 PM, "ya'aQov" <yaaqovz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Rabbi B. Rosen's advocacy for BDS was uninformed, fake leftist 
>>>>> posturing, as D. Green's
 is. Rosen had an epiphany during Operation 
>>>>> Cast Lead; that didn't improve his accuracy and analytical prowess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Possibly the best
 analyses of BDS is N. Chomsky's and N. Finkelstein's
>>>>>
>>>>> Again and again, people pretending to speak on behalf of Palestinian 
>>>>> people have NOT spoken with Palestinian people, and fail on 
>>>>> representing them.  Neither are they representing Israel's opposition 
>>>>> to their government's policies, nor are they attempting to collaborate 
>>>>> with Israelis opposing the occupation.  Rabbi Rosen qas a good example 
>>>>> for that: he mentioned friends in the Israeli opposition to he 
>>>>> occupation, yet he never attempted to align his Jewish Voice for Peace 
>>>>> with them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
 Protesting and bringing an end to the military occupation in the West 
>>>>> Bank and Gaza will not be accomplished by
 uninformed, fake posturing, 
>>>>> and fake representations.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:25 PM, C. G. Estabrook 
>>>>> <carl at newsfromneptune.com> wrote:
>>>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6MQiZk3CI0>.
>>>>>
>>>>> A "Counterpuncher" edition
>>>>> Produced and directed by Caleb Seripinas
>>>>> on Urbana Public Television
>>>>>
>>>>> The new number o the New Left Review (January February 2014) contains 
>>>>> an article by its quondam editor Perry Anderson on the life and career 
>>>>> of the late Alexander Cockburn,
 simply best political journalist in 
>>>>> America in the era of the coming of neoliberalism (and a major 
>>>>> influence on our program). An excerpt:
>>>>>
>>>>> From the start, long before Clinton was elected, Alexander foresaw 
>>>>> what the governor of Arkansas, mired in state-level malfeasance and 
>>>>> connexions to the Contra programme, would mean as a ruler of the 
>>>>> country: Walmart jobs for the many and Marc Rich pardons for the few. 
>>>>> Within five months of the new Presidency he was writing: ‘The Clinton 
>>>>> administration is over. Oh, it will drag on in a thickening twilight 
>>>>> of new beginnings and fresh
 tomorrows’, under a ruler whose language 
>>>>> bespoke his vision: ‘Clinton’s sloppy, tired phrases limp through the 
>>>>> reality of America like an obese Sunday jogger waddling down the road.’ 
>>>>> Of his claim to diplomatic fame, Alexander, abandoning mockery, wrote 
>>>>> in words that are no less implacably actual today:
>>>>>
>>>>> "It would take the pen of Swift to evoke the nauseating scenes of 
>>>>> hypocrisy, bad faith and self-delusion on the White House lawn today 
>>>>> [13 September 1993], crammed as it was with people who for long years 
>>>>> were complicit in the butchery and torture of Palestinians and the 
>>>>> denial of their rights, now applauding the ‘symbolic handshake’ that 
>>>>> in fact ratified further negation of those same
 rights. In the shadow 
>>>>> of an American President with the poise and verbiage of the manager of 
>>>>> a McDonald’s franchise, Arafat produced oratory so meagre it made 
>>>>> Rabin sound like Cicero.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Right now, Palestinians get the right to manage the world’s largest 
>>>>> prison, the Gaza Strip, plus one cow town. It’s as though the Irish in 
>>>>> 1921 got Tralee plus a few acres in West Cork, with the British 
>>>>> holding the entire eastern half, Belfast, Dublin, Waterford, plus all 
>>>>> the resources, with its army free to roam at will across the Irish 
>>>>> enclaves, themselves fragmented by British highways and drained of 
>>>>> water. There will be no Palestinian sovereignty and an economy 
>>>>> completely subordinated to Israel’s."
>>>>>
>>>>> ###
>>>
>
>
 _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss 

_______________________________________________
OccupyCU mailing list
OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net
https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/occupycu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140316/7f144610/attachment-0001.html>