[Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI

C. G. Estabrook galliher at illinois.edu
Tue Nov 2 22:23:06 CDT 2010


[1] I take it your first sentence is a humble confession of your situation, 
John. It seems to have no bearing on the point David raises otherwise.

[2] Can "escapism, or avoidance behavior" masquerade as  "acknowledg[ing] that 
[one doesn't] necessarily have a corner on all truth"?



On 11/2/10 10:12 PM, John W. wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:04 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu 
> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>> wrote:
>
>     This is an easy way to avoid the question of how the truth of things stands.
>
>
> It's never easy, Carl, to listen deeply to the truth possessed by other 
> people, particularly when you're so profoundly convinced of your own moral 
> correctness.
>
>     There's of course a good reason to do that: if the truth can be avoided,
>     so can any obligation to do anything in particular.
>
>
> I sincerely hope that you're too intelligent to fall into the trap of 
> conflating escapism, or avoidance behavior, with the humility required to 
> acknowledge that you don't necessarily have a corner on all truth.
>
>
>     On 11/2/10 9:43 PM, John W. wrote:
>>     Those of us who feel that we are blessed with a certain moral superiority
>>     or purity run the risk, it seems to me, of falling into the trap
>>     illustrated below.  To wit:
>>
>>     1)  We are by definition the Teachers, Custodians of The Facts;
>>
>>     2)  Those who disagree with our own analysis of The Facts are, by
>>     definition, incapable of "teachable moments"; and
>>
>>     3)  We drive away even those who are inclined to agree with us 90% of the
>>     time.
>>
>>     I have long felt that there is much wisdom to be gleaned from the parable
>>     of the five blind men and the elephant.
>>
>>     John Wason
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com
>>     <mailto:davegreen84 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Jennifer, it depends what you mean by "teachable moment." Before you
>>         can have "teachable moments," you have to stop having "dialogue" with
>>         those racists and oppressors who aren't the least bit interested in
>>         being taught anything. The "teachable moment" ought to arise from the
>>         moral clarity of the situation, which is related to a respect for the
>>         facts. But you can't do that when you're muddying the waters, such as
>>         you have done by lending credence to the notion that Israel is
>>         motivated by "security." So far, lots of "teachable moments" have
>>         resulted from the clarity that has been created by, recently, the
>>         attack on Lebanon in 2006, Gaza in 2008-09, and the flotilla earlier
>>         this year. I'm hoping that it won't take more massive criminality to
>>         provide more "teachable moments." But if that is to be the case, it
>>         will have to take some honesty about who is interested in listening,
>>         and who is not, and some proactive strategies about having a
>>         movement, rather than just paying lip service and having outside
>>         speakers. By the way, I don't have much respect for anyone who is
>>         "turned off" by being told the truth, whether about Israel or its
>>         supporters.
>>         DG
>>
>>         --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         *From:* Jenifer Cartwright <jencart13 at yahoo.com
>>         <mailto:jencart13 at yahoo.com>>
>>         *To:* John W. <jbw292002 at gmail.com <mailto:jbw292002 at gmail.com>>;
>>         David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com <mailto:davegreen84 at yahoo.com>>
>>         *Cc:* Peace Discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>         <mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>>
>>         *Sent:* Tue, November 2, 2010 5:15:04 PM
>>
>>         *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI
>>
>>         David,
>>         If you were looking for a teachable moment by writing and sending
>>         that letter to the DI, but instead you've succeeded in turning off
>>         even those who are [or were] in agreement w/ you about the larger
>>         Israeli-Palestinian issues, what was the point??
>>          --Jenifer
>>
>>         --- On *Tue, 11/2/10, David Green /<davegreen84 at yahoo.com
>>         <mailto:davegreen84 at yahoo.com>>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>             From: David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com
>>             <mailto:davegreen84 at yahoo.com>>
>>             Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI
>>             To: "John W." <jbw292002 at gmail.com <mailto:jbw292002 at gmail.com>>
>>             Cc: "Peace Discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>             <mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>>
>>             Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 3:06 PM
>>
>>             John, I referred to dialogue among those interested in  learning
>>             something from each other.
>>
>>             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>             *From:* John W. <jbw292002 at gmail.com <mailto:jbw292002 at gmail.com>>
>>             *To:* David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com
>>             <mailto:davegreen84 at yahoo.com>>
>>             *Cc:* Jenifer Cartwright <jencart13 at yahoo.com
>>             <mailto:jencart13 at yahoo.com>>; Peace Discuss
>>             <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>             <mailto:peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>>
>>             *Sent:* Tue, November 2, 2010 2:12:11 PM
>>             *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI
>>
>>
>>             On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:07 PM, David Green
>>             <davegreen84 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>                 The moral distinctions between the roles of Israelis and
>>                 Palestinians are no less clear than those between Nazis and
>>                 Jews. The results of those distinctions have been
>>                 qualitatively different: expulsion, ethnic cleansing,
>>                 occupation, confinement, etc., accompanied by lots of  murder
>>                 and attacks on other countries (Lebanon, Egypt), with deaths
>>                 into the tens of thousands, probably into the hundreds of
>>                 thousands at this point. And the goals of Zionism are rooted
>>                 in claims to racial superiority.
>>                 Nothing of what Israel does has anything to do with
>>                 "containment for security reasons." Any more than what
>>                 Germany did in the Warsaw Ghetto. That's the drum that the
>>                 Zionist students were beating last evening. They shouldn't be
>>                 allowed to get away with it--any more than we would allow for
>>                 any other kind of hate, relating to Muslims or gays or any
>>                 other group, based on appeals to fear. Racism is racism, hate
>>                 is hate, whether or not it is couched in assertions of hatred
>>                 attributed to the hated "other."
>>                 What's to be gained by "dialogue"?
>>                 DG
>>
>>
>>
>>             If nothing is to be gained by "dialogue", David, then why do you
>>             write your letters?  Why did you earlier suggest "teach-ins"?
>>
>>
>>
>>                 *From:* Jenifer Cartwright <jencart13 at yahoo.com>
>>                 *To:* Peace Discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; ASA
>>                 <asa.uiuc at gmail.com>; Irfan Ahmad <isahmad at uiuc.edu>; Lina
>>                 ASA <lelbesh2 at uiuc.edu>; Sadia Bekal <sbekal at uiuc.edu>; CAIR
>>                 <hrahman2 at uiuc.edu>; CAN <can.uiuc at gmail.com>; ISO
>>                 <iso.champaign at gmail.com>; Aisha Sobh <asobh at uiuc.edu>; STOP
>>                 <trevaellison at gmail.com>; David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>
>>                 *Sent:* Tue, November 2, 2010 1:56:42 PM
>>                 *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI
>>
>>                 David G,
>>                 Yikes! Yes, there is heightened emotion and ramped-up
>>                 rhetoric on both sides -- the occupied population --
>>                 "insurrectionists" -- are the good guys -- heroes! -- only in
>>                 reference to 1776 when the colonists were the former,
>>                 opposing British rule... but PLEASE acknowledge that there is
>>                 a HUGE HUGE HUGE difference betw containment out of fear/for
>>                 security reasons (how ever ill-conceived the intent and cruel
>>                 the result), and extermination of a population to destroy a
>>                 culture and preserve a "master race." You need to re-visit
>>                 that accusation and reword yr letter.
>>                  --Jenifer
>>
>>                 --- On *Tue, 11/2/10, David Green /<davegreen84 at yahoo.com>/*
>>                 wrote:
>>
>>
>>                     From: David Green <davegreen84 at yahoo.com>
>>                     Subject: [Peace-discuss] Letter submitted to DI
>>                     To: "Peace Discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>,
>>                     "ASA" <asa.uiuc at gmail.com>, "Irfan Ahmad"
>>                     <isahmad at uiuc.edu>, "Lina ASA" <lelbesh2 at uiuc.edu>, "ASA"
>>                     <asa.uiuc at gmail.com>, "Sadia Bekal" <sbekal at uiuc.edu>,
>>                     "CAIR" <hrahman2 at uiuc.edu>, "CAN" <can.uiuc at gmail.com>,
>>                     "ISO" <iso.champaign at gmail.com>, "Aisha Sobh"
>>                     <asobh at uiuc.edu>, "STOP" <trevaellison at gmail.com>
>>                     Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 12:27 PM
>>
>>                     On November 1st, Students for Justice in Palestine hosted
>>                     a courageous young Israeli woman at Noyes Lab who has
>>                     refused to serve in the Israeli occupying army. It was
>>                     reported at the conclusion of the event that SJP received
>>                     threats that attempted to undermine the event. I would
>>                     hope that these threats would be specified, publicized by
>>                     the DI, investigated by University Police, and addressed
>>                     by University administration.
>>
>>                     The event was well-attended, including a couple of dozen
>>                     Zionist students. Their questions were straight out of
>>                     what is called the "hasbara" (Zionist propaganda)
>>                     playbook. These students asserted that Palestinian hatred
>>                     for Israel is so stubborn that nothing that Israel does
>>                     could possibly do would do anything but endanger the
>>                     safety of Israelis. These assertions were competently
>>                     addressed by the speakers, including a Palestinian
>>                     student who spoke during the question period. The Israeli
>>                     speaker correctly asserted that the Israeli government is
>>                     the worst terrorist in the Middle East; but actually, it
>>                     would be more correct to say that the U.S. government is
>>                     the worst terrorist in the region.
>>
>>                     For the record, it's important to note that students who
>>                     support and rationalize Israeli atrocities are no
>>                     different than German youth in the 1930s who supported
>>                     the Nazi Party. Yes, they are young. Yes, they are
>>                     brainwashed. But given the information available, these
>>                     are not valid excuses. These ugly and hateful students
>>                     show us that in 2010, on the "diverse" UI campus, it is
>>                     still acceptable to support perpetrators and blame
>>                     victims, however obvious that distinction is, with all of
>>                     the racism that that such willful ignorance implies.
>>
>>                     This occurs partly because University administration
>>                     tacitly equivocates between social justice and political
>>                     evil on issues of war and peace in the Middle East. At
>>                     that level, we all ought to be ashamed of ourselves.
>>
>>                     David Green
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Peace-discuss mailing list
>>     Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>     <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>>     http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20101102/5979420d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list