[Peace-discuss] [Peace] This list is for brief announcementsonly

E.Wayne Johnson ewj at pigs.ag
Thu Oct 21 21:19:02 CDT 2010


don't spam my ibex.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bill Strutz 
  To: C. G. Estabrook 
  Cc: carol inskeep ; Stuart Levy ; Peace-discuss 
  Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 9:25 AM
  Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] This list is for brief announcementsonly


  http://www.break.com/index/theres-no-point-arguing-with-an-ibex.html





  On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:19 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:

    Why? Does your inbox get clogged up?  Does your delete key not work?

    'If liberty means anything', George Orwell once said, 'it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear'.

    Amen.


    On 10/21/10 7:03 PM, Stuart Levy wrote:

      On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 06:58:00PM -0500, C. G. Estabrook wrote:

        Why don't you participate in discussions of this nature on Peace Discuss?

        I know that you at least once upon a time thought that our killing people
        in Asia was important enough to be concerned about.

      Carl, and all,

      Please avoid discussions, regardless of worthiness, on the Peace list.
      It is not for that, and we should respect the wishes of people
      who choose to subscribe to it and not to peace-discuss.

      If someone else writes to Peace, and you'd like to discuss the issues involved,
      please *change* the destination to Peace-Discuss.


        On 10/21/10 11:38 AM, carol inskeep wrote:

          Discussions of this nature belong on Peace Discuss.

          --- On *Wed, 10/20/10, C. G. Estabrook /<galliher at illinois.edu>/* wrote:


              From: C. G. Estabrook<galliher at illinois.edu>
              Subject: Re: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Fw: Money Can't Vote
              To: "Gregg Gordon"<ggregg79 at yahoo.com>
              Cc: "Peace List"<peace at lists.chambana.net>, "Peace-discuss"
              <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
              Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 11:09 PM

              First, Iraq and Afghanistan are both part of what the Pentagon calls
          "The
              Long War" (for oil) in the Mideast.  So far, the US has killed a
          million
              people in Iraq under Clinton (whose Secretary of State said that the
          tens
              of thousands of dead children were "worth it"); a million under Bush;
          and
              apparently hundreds of thousands in AfPak under Bush and his third
          (Obama)
              term.

              That falls short of the perhaps 4 million we killed in SE Asia, but of
              course Obama's escalated murders in SW Asia are in no way justified by
              being fewer in number than Kennedy-Johnson-Nixon's in Vietnam.

              It's difficult to determine when the Long War begins, but it takes a
          tick
              up in the Carter administration when Carter (and Obama's) adviser
          Zbigniew
              Brzezinski sends Osama bin Laden and friends into Afghanistan (before
          the
              Russian invasion) "to give the Russians a Vietnam of their own," as he
              said at the time, in the most expensive CIA operation to date.

              If a Republican administration after 2012 brings Obama's AfPak war to
          an
              end, then we'll have a third example of a Democratic war concluded by
              Republicans in as many generations. But that may not be likely. The
          news
              suggests that the Obama administration is looking to expand the war
          with
              an attack on Pakistan and/or Iran.  It certainly isn't looking to
          abandon
              the world's greatest energy-producing region.

              Control of Mideast energy resources has been a cornerstone of US
          foreign
              policy since 1945. Obama is simply lying when he says the war is to
          "stop
              terrorism" - it obviously increases terrorism - but he has to lie,
          because
              the only Constitutional authority he has to wage war in the Mideast is
              Congress' "Authorization for the Use of Military Force" of September
          2001
              - which is directed against terrorism.

              Something positive to do: years ago, there was a great debate in
          America,
              "How do we get out of Vietnam?"  The best answer was given by Herb
          Caen:
              "Ships and planes." Load up the troops and bring them home.  The
          Russians
              did - and survived and prospered from the end of their war.

              Eventually we did, but it took two presidents' being driven from
          office
              and (even more important) a revolt of the American conscript army  to
          do it.

              Regards, CGE

              On 10/20/10 7:15 PM, Gregg Gordon wrote:

                So I conclude from your statement that you don't consider either Iraq
            or
                Afghanistan to be "major" wars.  So why are you so worked up about
            them?     I think you're just still mad at Lyndon Johnson.
                And please, don't accuse me of being some kind of racist who doesn't
            mind
                us murdering brown people.  That is /so/ lame.  It's just that not
            all of
                us see the world in as simple terms as you seem to.  Simple solutions
            are
                nice, but they're mainly for the simple-minded.
                All I'm saying is if you're so gung-ho on stopping the war, why don't
            you
                come up with something positive to do (as opposed to sniping from the
                sidelines) that might help get us closer to that goal?  We'll all get
                behind you.


            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                *From:* C. G. Estabrook<galliher at illinois.edu>
                </mc/compose?to=galliher at illinois.edu>
                *To:* Gregg Gordon<ggregg79 at yahoo.com>
            </mc/compose?to=ggregg79 at yahoo.com>
                *Cc:* Jenifer Cartwright<jencart13 at yahoo.com>
                </mc/compose?to=jencart13 at yahoo.com>; Peace List
                <peace at lists.chambana.net>  </mc/compose?to=peace at lists.chambana.net>;
                Peace-discuss<peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                </mc/compose?to=peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                *Sent:* Wed, October 20, 2010 5:10:40 PM
                *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] [Peace] Fw: Money Can't Vote

                You are aware, are you not, that America's major wars since WWII -
            called
                by synecdoche "Korea" and "Vietnam" - were started by Democratic
                administrations and ended by Republican administrations.  Since the
                current Democratic administration has greatly expanded the killing in
                AfPak, it's hard to argue that they're going to reverse their
            policies.
                Voting for them is an acquiescence to those policies.

                To say of Obama and the Democrats, "Let them kill some Asians,
            because
                they might do some good someplace else," is at best a counsel of
            despair,
                if not an outright  criminal attitude.  Particularly when it seems
            that
                they're doing precisely the wrong things elsewhere, too - not
                surprisingly, because they're working for the owners of the banks,
            the
                insurance companies, the oil and construction companies, etc.  --CGE


                On 10/20/10 4:48 PM, Gregg Gordon wrote:

                  Maybe because there are other important issues that she /does/ agree
                  with him on.  The only way you're going to find a candidate you're
              in
                  100% agreement with is to run for office.  If support for the war is
              an
                  absolute deal breaker for you, fine.  Not everybody sees it that
              way.     But if you think the war will end sooner if more Republicans
              get
                  elected, I think you're out of your mind.


              --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  *From:* C. G. Estabrook<galliher at illinois.edu>
                  </mc/compose?to=galliher at illinois.edu>
                  *To:* Jenifer Cartwright<jencart13 at yahoo.com>
                  </mc/compose?to=jencart13 at yahoo.com>
                  *Cc:* Peace List<peace at lists.chambana.net>
                  </mc/compose?to=peace at lists.chambana.net>; Peace-discuss
                  <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                  </mc/compose?to=peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                  *Sent:* Wed, October 20, 2010 4:33:52 PM
                  *Subject:* Re: [Peace] [Peace-discuss] Fw: Money Can't Vote

                  This guy supports the war. I can't see why anyone on an anti-war
              list
                  would contribute to him.


                  On 10/20/10 4:28 PM, Jenifer Cartwright wrote:

                    Another request for help...
                    I love this guy!
                     --Jenifer

                    --- On *Wed, 10/20/10, Rep. Alan Grayson
                    /<alangrayson at graysonforcongress.com>
                    </mc/compose?to=alangrayson at graysonforcongress.com>/*wrote:

                        *CallforGrayson.com<http://callforgrayson.com/>*


                <http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=EiO1kyCw5ZXoQYu90OP6ADErf1BaXE1j>

                        *Make 10 calls now!

                <http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2B2LAE05OJuToQYu90OP6ADErf1BaXE1j>*

                        Dear Jenifer,

                        This election is about the people standing against corporate
                        special interests, which are trying to bury me with lying ads
                        because they know I can’t be bought. But money can’t vote
                – people can.

                        This week is the first week of Early Vote, which means people
                in
                        Central Florida are voting right now.

                        Getting our supporters to the polls now could make up our
                winning
                        margin, and that's why we need you calling supporters and
                asking
                        them to vote.

                        You can start calling whenever you like, but*we really need
                people
                        to start calling at 4 p.m. Eastern Time*.

                        Can you sign up for a shift *today from 4-6 p.m. ET

                <http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=skqQDKWGeY%2FoQYu90OP6ADErf1BaXE1j>,
                        or this evening 6-8 p.m. ET

                <http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=5nA4hYzIEJnoQYu90OP6ADErf1BaXE1j>*?

                        We'll give you suggestions on what to say, and a reporting tool
                so
                        it's easy to let us know how it's going.

                        Thank you.

                        Truth,

                        Alan Grayson

                        P.S. -- If you don't have time today, please sign up to make
                calls
                        on another day between now and Election Day, November 2. Every
                        voter you talk to will make a difference.

                        *Sign up now.

                <http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BcjPfm%2B%2FQSzoQYu90OP6ADErf1BaXE1j>*


                        Paid for and Authorized by the Committee to Elect Alan Grayson

                        empowered by Salsa<http://www.salsalabs.com/?email>
                        Web Bug from
                http://salsa.mydccc.org/dia/TrackImage?key=29044283



                    _______________________________________________
                    Peace-discuss mailing list
                    Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
                </mc/compose?to=Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                    http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss


                  _______________________________________________
                  Peace-discuss mailing list
                  Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
              </mc/compose?to=Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
                  http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss

              -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

              _______________________________________________
              Peace mailing list
              Peace at lists.chambana.net</mc/compose?to=Peace at lists.chambana.net>
              http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace



        _______________________________________________
        Peace-discuss mailing list
        Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
        http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss

    _______________________________________________
    Peace mailing list
    Peace at lists.chambana.net
    http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace




  -- 
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has been found difficult and not tried."  -- GK Chesterton




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Peace-discuss mailing list
  Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
  http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20101022/00641f93/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list